Friday, April 19, 2024
57.2 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    United States Socialist Republic book by HG Goerner

    Three months in, Newsom has only tepid approval

     

     

    By 

    Gavin Newsom coasted into the governorship last year, defeating his Republican rival by more than a 3-2 margin.

    It seems a little odd, therefore, that three months into his governorship, he enjoys only tepid popular support.

    A new poll by the Public Policy Institute of California found that just 45 percent of all adults, and the same percentage of likely voters, approve of Newsom’s governorship so far.

    It’s not surprising that Republicans strongly disapprove of Newsom, the most outwardly liberal governor of recent history. Just 20 percent of GOP voters say he’s doing a good job.

    It is surprising, however, that his fellow Democrats are less than fully enthusiastic, with 65 percent approval, or that just 35 percent of independents, most of whom lean Democratic, like the job he’s doing.

    Overall, one could say, Californians are giving their new governor about a “C” – and that may be just about what he deserves.

    Newsom clearly yearns to make his mark with an almost dizzying barrage of pronouncements and proposals, but some have been misfires.

    During his first State of the State speech, for example, he issued what turned out to be a very confusing appraisal of the state’s much-troubled high-speed rail project.

    While praising it as an “ambitious vision,” Newsom then declared:

    “But let’s be real. The project, as currently planned, would cost too much and take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency, Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to LA.”

    He went on to say he wants to “complete a high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield” that would tie into planned lower-speed rail into the Bay Area.

    Clearly, he proposed to radically scale back what had been seen as a statewide system and it was reported as such, but then Newsom more or less backtracked and blamed the news media for misinterpreting his words.

    The PPIC poll found that a bare majority of voters approve of scaling back the project, but there’s an obvious split between those who want it to be fully built and those who want complete abandonment.

    A second miscue came when he said new regional housing quotas would be created and if local governments didn’t meet them “we’re going to take (transportation funds) from you,” referring to the state’s new gas tax.

    The threat to withhold funds sparked an outcry not only from local officials but Newsom’s fellow Democrats in the Legislature, saying it undermined promises made to voters when a measure to repeal the tax was on the ballot last year.

    Newsom was forced to scale back his proposal, saying it wouldn’t take effect until well into the next decade – but even in that form, it faces an uphill battle in the Legislature.

    The new governor’s third big foray into untested political territory was his blanket reprieve for more than 700 residents of California’s death row.

    He described it as a matter of morality, but last year, he and his campaign repeatedly pledged that despite his personal opposition to capital punishment, he would respect the wishes of voters, who twice in this decade rejected efforts to repeal the death penalty.

    PPIC’s poll did find that by a 2-1 margin, voters prefer life imprisonment without parole for murderers, rather than the death penalty.

    Does that mean they would repeal the death penalty as Newsom hopes? Not necessarily, because capital punishment advocates would graphically describe the sadistic crimes that landed so many killers on death row, and depict Newsom as their savior.

    Republished with permission from Source


    Dan Walters has been a journalist for nearly 57 years, spending all but a few of those years working for California newspapers. He began his professional career in 1960, at age 16, at the Humboldt Times in Eureka, while still attending high school, and turned down a National Merit scholarship to continue working as a journalist. At one point in his career, at age 22, he was the nation’s youngest daily newspaper editor. The Hanford Sentinel was the first of three newspaper editor positions before joining the Sacramento Union’s Capitol bureau in 1975, just as Jerry Brown began his governorship. Walters later became the Union’s Capitol bureau chief, and in 1981 began writing the state’s only daily newspaper column devoted to California political, economic and social events. In 1984, he and the column moved to The Sacramento Bee. He has written more than 9,000 columns about California and its politics and his column has appeared in many other California newspapers. Walters has written about California and its politics for a number of other publications, including The Wall Street Journal and the Christian Science Monitor. In 1986, his book, “The New California: Facing the 21st Century,” was published in its first edition. He is also the founding editor of the “California Political Almanac,” the co-author of a book on lobbying entitled “The Third House: Lobbyists, Money and Power in Sacramento,” and contributed chapters to two other books, “Remaking California” and “The New Political Geography of California. He also has been a frequent guest on national television news shows, commenting on California politics.



    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x