Thursday, November 14, 2024
48.2 F
Oxnard
More

    Latest Posts

    Setting Brushfires of Freedom by Don Jans

    California Spends The 4th Most On Welfare

    In its first year, the Biden Administration has embarked on an aggressive domestic agenda intended to offer a variety of economic support to lower and middle class Americans. The American Rescue Plan, passed in March, included direct payments to U.S. households, new investments into safety net programs like food stamps and unemployment, and increases to the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit. The Biden Administration followed this just a few weeks later with two proposals, the American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan, which would dramatically scale up federal spending on a variety of programs for infrastructure, job creation, education, child care, health, food assistance, and tax relief. Biden’s agenda has prioritized a strong role for the federal government in offering financial support to needy Americans and creating pathways to the middle class.

    This agenda would represent a new chapter for the U.S. welfare state, building beyond the New Deal programs introduced in the 1930s and the Great Society programs enacted in the 1960s. These earlier programs created a wide-ranging role for the government in protecting disadvantaged citizens from economic harms. Today, public welfare encompasses a variety of government programs whose benefits are contingent on need, such as Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

    Because these programs are typically based on demographic and economic factors, they have grown with shifts in the population and economy over time. According to the Census Bureau, in the last 20 years alone, state and local welfare spending has more than tripled in nominal dollars, rising from $233 billion nationally in 2000 to $743 billion in 2019. As a share of total spending, welfare spending has risen from 13.4% of state and local budgets at the start of the millennium to 18.8% in 2019. But even on a per capita basis, spending is up nearly 180% over that span.

    And in comparison to other budget items, public welfare is now the single largest category of expenditure in state and local budgets. Welfare spending totals $743 billion, narrowly topping elementary and secondary education spending ($717 billion) and running far ahead of other categories like higher education, highways, and protective services.

    While the role of state and local government in welfare spending has grown everywhere, some states invest more than others in welfare programs. There are a variety of reasons why this is the case. For one, states with more liberal politics may choose to invest a greater amount in social safety net programs, which is why many coastal states have greater per capita welfare spending, led by New York at $4,094. Another source of disparities between states is their underlying population or economic characteristics. For instance, states like Arkansas, West Virginia, and Kentucky all spend more than a quarter of their budgets on welfare spending, which is likely due to the fact that they have greater populations of low-income residents who are eligible for state-administered federal assistance programs like TANF or Medicaid.

    To determine the states spending the most on public welfare, researchers at Commodity.com calculated total state and local welfare spending per person using the most recent data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Public welfare spending includes cash assistance payments, vendor payments, and other uncategorized payments administered by state and local governments.

    The analysis found that in California, 21.1% of total state spending is dedicated to welfare spending, compared to the national average of 18.8%. In total, California spends about $3,403 per resident on welfare each year. Out of all U.S. states, California spends the 4th most on welfare. Here is a summary of the data for California:

    • State & local welfare spending per capita: $3,403
    • State & local welfare spending as a share of total spending: 21.1%
    • Total state & local welfare spending: $133,978,520,000
    • Cash assistance payments: $6,917,786,000
    • Vendor payments: $108,643,810,000
    • Other public welfare: $18,416,924,000

    For reference, here are the statistics for the entire United States:

    • State & local welfare spending per capita: $2,257
    • State & local welfare spending as a share of total spending: 18.8%
    • Total state & local welfare spending: $743,712,401,000
    • Cash assistance payments: $23,020,008,000
    • Vendor payments: $620,896,279,000
    • Other public welfare: $99,796,114,000

    For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Commodity.com’s website: https://commodity.com/blog/us-states-welfare/

    Mike LaFirenza writes for Lattice News Wire


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    - Advertisement -

    4 COMMENTS

    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    4 Comments
    Newest
    Oldest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    trackback
    California Still Pretty Good | Parkway Blog
    1 year ago

    […] bifurcated economy involves higher welfare expenditures—California spends a larger share of its budget on welfare than virtually any state, Governor Gavin Newsom’s go-to solution to the state’s […]

    trackback
    Can California Be Saved? - Barbershop Talk
    1 year ago

    […] bifurcated economy involves higher welfare expenditures—California spends a larger share of its budget on welfare than virtually any state, Governor Gavin Newsom’s go-to solution to the state’s […]

    Tom
    Tom
    3 years ago

    Cash assistance payments per capita: $176 the 2nd highest
    Vendor payments per capita: $2,760 the 6th highest
    Other public welfare per capita: $468 the 7th highest

    Tommy
    Tommy
    1 year ago
    Reply to  Tom

    But California is also #3 most expensive cost-of-living so it makes sense expenditures are near the top. And it’s a high cost of living because the California economy is so much stronger than the other states.

    So where’s the problem? Or do you just hate the recipients that much??

    Latest Posts

    advertisement

    Don't Miss

    Subscribe

    To receive the news in your inbox

    4
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x