Friday, July 19, 2024
74.3 F
Oxnard
More
    Home Blog Page 2227

    ‘Seal Team’ Star Discuses the Importance of Honoring Military Sacrifice as an Actor in a Military Inspired Series

    0

    David Hookstead | Reporter

     

    “SEAL Team” star Max Thieriot was kind enough to speak to me about the second season of the CBS hit series, and it sounds like there are some great things on the horizon.

    As you all know, I’m a huge fan of the show, and I have been ever since the first episode aired. That’s why I was so pumped to speak with Max, who plays Bravo Team member Clay Spenser in the series. (RELATED: ‘SEAL Team‘ Is Excellent In New Episode ‘Things Not Seen’)

    Let’s dive right into what he had to say!

    *Some of the questions and answers have been slightly edited for clarity and smoothness.

    We’ve been off the air now for about two months (interview was conducted Wednesday before the newest episode aired). We’re coming back tonight. What’s it like to finally be back? Lot of anticipation, lot of fans that were waiting. What’s it like to know we finally got some new episodes?

    Oh man, it’s a relief. … One of the hardest things … I think is keeping everybody waiting, and in a holding pattern, waiting to see new episodes because I know there are a lot of people who are itching to watch them. So, I’m excited. I think leading up to this last eight-nine episodes of the season, I can say confidently that the back half of the season is awesome. I mean, it really ramps up. There is some really really great action stuff along with a great storyline, character development stuff. We kind of dive into a lot of stuff we really haven’t really talked about before. It’s great. We got some of our best episodes ever for sure are coming up.

    One of the big storylines was when Jason’s wife was killed off the show — a gut-wrenching turn of events. Was the cast pretty surprised to find out that was going to happen? Because as an audience member who watched all of it, that was like getting hit by a train.

    If I’m being honest, I think yes and no. We were surprised because it’s such a big decision; it’s such a big commitment to make and such a bold card to play that early on such a great character. But at the same time, from a film and television viewer, it’s also weirdly important sometimes to do that stuff because it keeps the audience on their toes. You don’t want people to be able to think they will be able to expect everything all the time. As far as us being surprised or not, the only reason why we weren’t totally surprised is [because] Michaela’s a fantastic actor, and she had booked another television show that she was going on to do. And so, scheduling-wise, it was going to be really hard to work it out. That sort of helps in that decision-making process.

    Speaking of women on the show, can we expect anything between Clay and Stella going forward, or is that pretty much over? Because it obviously didn’t end well. Clay carried a lot of that with him when he deployed right afterward. Is that storyline done or can we, as fans, hold out hope that those two might still have a future?

    As far as the future, I’m not sure. But, I think, as fans, you can expect that it hasn’t been fully resolved and figured out. We’ll see some of Stella again. It’s just a matter of what way we are going to be seeing her.

    We have a huge military audience, and they really like how the show shines a light on the personal aspect of the military. How important is it to you guys when you’re out there — both in the action scenes and in the personal life stuff — to really give the respect and shine a light on the people who have actually been through this? Is that always in the back of your mind, that, ‘Hey, we really got to hit home runs here because this isn’t a game. There are people who actually make these sacrifices every day.’

    One-hundred percent, David. I think the thing is, to be honest, that’s the most important thing to us. Whether the technical aspect [of] the military tactics or the stuff that now goes on in this community or if it’s the personal life stories or, like you said, the sacrifices that these men and women make … to make sure we are as authentic as we can possibly be is, by far, the most important thing. And sometimes, like Adam’s death, those things aren’t necessarily what we want to see, but they’re realities. They’re realities of the job and what these people go through. And so, obviously, it’s the most important thing for us, to show it in the best possible way, but also the most real way.

    Speaking of the tactics and stuff, what type of training do they run you guys through to make sure that when you are handling the weapons it looks realistic, when you’re moving, when you’re breaching doors, it all looks realistic? How much time did it take for you guys to go through before you started feeling comfortable with it?

    [For] the pilot, we sort of jumped right into it. We didn’t have a whole lot of time. We had amazing technical advisors on set and we still … have a couple Delta guys, guys from various field teams, we have Marine Force Recon, we have guys from all different branches of the military that are on the show as producers, writers, actors, stuntmen, crew and, so, we have a lot of time rehearsing now. It’s repeated motion, right? It’s like riding a bike. The more and more you do it, the more comfortable you get and the more normal it looks. I’m a country boy so I came from a small town, Northern California, where everybody owned guns. We grew up, you know, hunting and fishing. It’s obviously not the same gun movement, but I spend a lot of times around guns and have been around them since I was eight or nine years old. For me, it was kind of more learning some of the technical stuff.

    One of the neat things about the show, especially the Mexico storyline and the storyline about the rescuing of the ISIS bride — there really seems like there are a lot of things that are in the news that are often reflected in the show. Do the writers try to leave a lot of room so that they can try to mold things to current events? Or is it just kind of coincidence when stuff like that happens?

    Both. I think the writers’ goal is to half an overlying arch that the audience can track, but also we can have these missions and things going on that are current events. We can kind of jump in and out of those while following character development and these storylines throughout the season. A lot of those current events and things going on, we try to not remake identically, but certainly, the cartel stuff and those things are all sorts of related to things that are going on.

    If any of the actors on Bravo Team actually had to go through BUDS, who would be the first one to quit? Who would likely make it the farthest?

    I can say confidently that I would make it the farthest. The first one to quit? I think that AJ will willingly say that he would probably be the first one to quit. He’s kind of stated that before. I think he’s like, “Dude, you’re out of your mind.”

    On the show, characters are, obviously, a really tight-knit group, a lot of great comradery stuff like that. When cameras aren’t rolling, do you guys like to do anything fun? Keep loose? Pranks on set? Or anything like that to keep morale high?

    Yeah, I’m the biggest prankster on set. As you can see on my Instagram, I’m pretty much always, specifically, I prank AJ more than anybody. But, it’s because he and I are just such buddies and he’s an easy target and I’m always around him. So he makes it easy and fun to pick on [him]. But, yeah, we kind of keep it as light as we possibly can in between. Clearly, there are days that are really serious and emotional and, on those days, yeah, things are a little different. But, when we’re out there running in the hills and shooting late nights and stacking up on doors to breach, we keep it as light as we possibly can and joke around.

    Make sure to tune in to “SEAL Team” Wednesday nights at 10 p.m. EST to catch new episodes.

    You know that I’ll be watching and keeping you all as updated as I can on the show!

    Special thanks to Graham Gallagher for transcribing the interview.

     

    Follow David Hookstead on Twitter


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Back-to-School Brigade | Helping Military Families With Supplies


    Operation Homefront is a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit whose mission is to build strong, stable, and secure military families so they can thrive — not simply struggle to get by — in the communities they have worked so hard to protect. For over fifteen years, we have provided programs that offer: RELIEF (through Critical Financial Assistance and transitional housing programs), RESILIENCY (through permanent housing and caregiver support services) and RECURRING FAMILY SUPPORT programs and services throughout the year that help military families overcome the short-term bumps in the road so they don’t become long-term chronic problems. Operation Homefront has consistently earned high ratings from leading charity rating services, including Charity Navigator, which gave OH 4 Stars for 11 consecutive years for superior service and accountability. At Operation Homefront, 92 percent of expenditures goes directly toward delivering programs and services to the military families who need it most.


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Ventura College Foundation Seeks Sponsors for Student Scholarship Events

    Ventura, Calif.—The Ventura College Foundation is seeking sponsors for several Ventura College student scholarship award events scheduled for April and May.

    The inaugural Allied Health Scholarship Awards ceremony will be held Saturday, April 13 at Ventura College’s Wright Event Center. This new scholarship event will honor Ventura College students interested in paramedic, nursing and other medical fields.

    The 20th Annual Phoenix Scholarship Awards will be held Thursday, April 18 also at Ventura College’s Wright Event Center. The Phoenix Scholarship Program was established in 1999 by VC Foundation board members to support Ventura College re-entry students. Phoenix Scholarships are designed to assist students who have minimal or no resources to pay for their education and have chosen to return to school after a break in education.  The recipients are selected based on each student’s academic goals and progress, together with their financial need.

    The 32nd Annual Scholarship Awards luncheon will be held Saturday, May 4 at the Crowne Plaza Ventura Beach. All currently enrolled Ventura College students have access to just under 300 different scholarships through the VC Foundation.

    “These events are a way to show our students how much the community appreciates their commitment to their education,” says Rob van Nieuwburg, Ventura College Foundation board chair. “Our sponsors’ support makes these events truly memorable for these students who have worked so hard to succeed despite sometimes daunting odds.”

    Sponsorship opportunities range from Gold Chest sponsors ($500) to presenting Black Pearl sponsor ($10,000). For more information, contact Gerry Pantoja at 805-289-58, [email protected].

    Established in 1983, the Ventura College Foundation provides financial support to the students and the programs of Ventura College to facilitate student success and grow the impact and legacy of Ventura College as a vital community asset. The Foundation also hosts the Ventura College Foundation Marketplace; an outdoor shopping experience held every weekend on the Ventura College campus east parking lot. For more information, contact Julie Harvey at (805) 289-6502 or [email protected] or visit www.VCgiving.org.

    Ventura College Foundation


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Sight and Sound Film Festival 2019 – Call For Entries

    Oxnard, California – The Sight + Sound Film Festival – a joint production between the City of Oxnard, The Oxnard Performing Arts Center (The PACC) and Oxnard College – is accepting film submissions for consideration now thru May 30, 2019.

    Sight + Sound will hold its inaugural event on August 16-18, 2019. The festival will bring audiences to the very edges of cinematic programming. Also featured will be workshops on video editing and monster makeup and spaces to zen out Tinseltown-style. The festival will heighten every olfactory, tactile, optical, and auditory point of contact. Even tastebuds will be rewarded with themed drinks and curated bites between film screenings and during the after parties.

    Entries can be submitted into any of the following categories:

    ·         Features (60 minutes or longer)

    ·         Shorts (45 minutes or less)

    ·         Student (20 minutes or less)

    ·         Web (7 minutes or less)*

    o    *In addition to general web content, ASMR (Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response) videos are encouraged.

    ·         Docs (45 minutes or less for shorts and 60 minutes or longer for feature docs)

    Deadlines to submit and accompanying fees are as follows:

    ·         Early Deadline – April 5, 2019 – $10 student/$20 general

    ·         Regular Deadline – May 10, 2019 – $15 student/$25 general

    ·         Late Deadline – May 30, 2019 – $20 student/$30 general

    Additional submission details can be found on the festival’s website: www.sightplussound.com/submissions or on filmfreeway.com/SightplusSound

    Filmmakers and film enthusiasts are encouraged to stay abreast of festival ongoings. In addition to a preview party that took place in August of this year, the committee will be hosting networking activities and intermittent film screenings and other activities to connect those in the film industry, spark creativity and partnerships and generate continued interest in the festival itself. The website will also spotlight local filmmakers and films currently in production.  

     

    Sight + Sound Film Festival 2019 – Convocatoria de entradas

    Oxnard, California – El Festival de Cine Sight + Sound, una producción conjunta entre la Ciudad de Oxnard, el Oxnard Performing Arts Center (PACC) y Oxnard College, está aceptando presentaciones de películas para su consideración hasta el 30 de mayo de 2019.

    Sight + Sound celebrará su evento inaugural del 16 al 18 de agosto de 2019. El festival llevará al público a los límites de la programación cinematográfica. También se ofrecerán talleres sobre edición de video y maquillaje de monstruos y espacios para explorar el estilo de Tinseltown. El festival aumentará todos los puntos de contacto olfativos, táctiles, ópticos y auditivos. Incluso las papilas gustativas serán recompensadas con bebidas temáticas y bocadillos curados entre las proyecciones de películas y durante las fiestas posteriores.

    Las entradas pueden ser enviadas en cualquiera de las siguientes categorías:

    ·         Características (60 minutos o más)

    ·         Cortometraje (45 minutos o menos)

    ·         Estudiante (20 minutos o menos)

    ·         Web (7 minutos o menos) *
    * Además del contenido web general, se recomiendan los videos de ASMR (Respuesta Meridiana Sensorial Autónoma).

    ·         Docs (45 minutos o menos para cortometraje y 60 minutos o más para documentos de características)

    Los plazos para presentar y las tarifas correspondientes son los siguientes:

    ·         Fecha límite temprana – 5 de abril de 2019 – $ 10 por estudiante / $ 20 en general

    ·         Fecha límite regular: 10 de mayo de 2019 – $ 15 por estudiante / $ 25 en general

    ·         Fecha límite tardía – 30 de mayo de 2019 – $ 20 por estudiante / $ 30 en general

    Los detalles adicionales de la presentación se pueden encontrar en el sitio web del festival: www.sightplussound.com/submissions ofilmfreeway.com/SightplusSound 

    Se anima a los cineastas y entusiastas del cine a mantenerse al tanto de las actuaciones del festival. Además de una fiesta de presentación preliminar que tuvo lugar en agosto de este año, el comité organizará actividades de creación de redes y proyecciones de películas intermitentes y otras actividades para conectar a los miembros de la industria cinematográfica, estimular la creatividad y las alianzas y generar un interés continuo en el festival. El sitio web también destacará a los cineastas y películas locales actualmente en producción.

    City of Oxnard and The Oxnard Performing Arts Center


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Ventura | ‘Leap of Faith’ Complex – New Ideas for an Old Project

    1

    By Kevin Harris

    The Ventura City Council green lighted the review process for a local, controversial new residential-commercial complex, adopted an amended second-year Capital Improvement Plan, and authorized the city to fund the Museum of Ventura County another $250,000, during a marathon, 5-hour city council meeting Monday night. The meeting was so long that the council was forced to move the formal item of “Status Update/Receiving City Council Direction,” to a future meeting.

    “Leap of Faith” Complex – New Ideas for an Old Project

    Noah Ornstein

    Generating the most public interest during the evening was Public Hearing Item 11A – a Request for Call for Review, Leap of Faith Design Review. The bulk of the presentation was given by Leap of Faith (Applicant) co-founder, Noah Ornstein.

    This property, located at 2055 North Ventura Avenue, sits on a 6-acre lot, and originally was designed for 105 condos, commercial areas and 250 standard parking spaces. In 2014, PC/DRC approved a slightly amended version of the design (with 20 more condos, some added parking spots and some low and very low income units). The applicant, who purchased the property from the original owners in 2015 (as revealed much later resulting from council questioning), eventually proposed to amend the project significantly, prompting the PC/DRC to do a “pre-review” of the newly proposed building designs, construction methods, and in particular, the automated parking lifts.

    The new building design is to be more modular in shape and color than traditional buildings, while most of the construction will be done offsite, reducing construction time, cost, and lessening the noise and traffic impact on the community. According to Ornstein, the proposed automated parking lifts (190 of them), will eliminate the standard parking spaces, thus reducing the complex’s overall footprint, and creating an additional 20 thousand square feet of open space, which the company will convert to a park.

    “This was a previously approved project. The modifications that we have made to this project enhance our particular capabilities and unique aesthetic,” Ornstein told the council.

    The PUBLIC COMMENTS period of the public hearing revealed a mixture of opposition and support for the project. Following is a brief sampling of the speakers who presented:

    Suz Montgomery:  Opposes a new development on the Westside because of worsening traffic and parking issues. “Until we straighten out the parking situation and the traffic on the Westside, nothing should be approved. We have nothing. We have no services,” she said.

    Stephanie Caldwell:  President/CEO, Ventura Chamber of Commerce. “The Chamber recognizes the lack of affordable housing as the single most significant impediment to economic growth and development herein Ventura. Housing at all levels continues to be a priority,” she said. She told the council that the project supports the need for more housing, and also meets the city’s environmental goals (due to Leap of Faith’s offsite building proposal). Caldwell concluded by asking the council to accept staff’s recommendation and allow the project to move forward.

    Matt Bell:  Westside resident. Mr. Bell said he does not believe the project fits in with the community, and that he’s concerned about gentrification. He asked the council to delay their decision, and warned about power outages as they relate to the parking lifts.

    During the COUNCIL COMMENT AND QUESTION period, some confusion arose about the legal constraints on the council not being allowed to know which council members triggered the review, and what specific issues they were concerned about. Council Members Jim Friedman and Erik Nasarenko both asked City Attorney Greg Diaz for clarification. Diaz said that any council members who openly give such specifics would then have to remove themselves from the review process, though the details about the relevant law remains a mystery.

    While answering a question from Council Member Nasarenko related to a concern from a public question, Ornstein said that every automatic parking lift is equipped with a backup power supply and a fire sprinkler.

    Council Member Christy Weir discussed her safety concerns with the automated parking lifts in disaster situations. “I would not want any project moving forward that would have any possibility of trapping people in an emergency, and we have never done this before,” Weir said. She suggested that because of the council’s lack of experience with such lifts, as well as a lack of any documentation related to their performance from other places, she is hesitant on moving forward with the updated design.

    During Council Member Cheryl Heitman’s question session with Ornstein, it was revealed that the amended Leap of Faith project is made up entirely of rental units, as opposed to the owner-occupied condominiums of the original version of the project, causing visible shock to the council.

    Deputy Mayor Sofia Rubalcava said she was concerned that shoppers just wanting a quick cup of coffee at center won’t want to deal with the hassles of using the car lift, but will instead opt to park on the street, potentially worsening area street parking issues. She also asked Ornstein what the average rent of the condos will be. Ornstein, who at first did not appear to have an answer prepared, did respond after some more pushing by Rubalcava. He said they would target 35% to 40% of the average median income for the area.

    Mayor Matt LaVere confirmed with staff that the Fire Department will fully approve project safety at a future stage of review, and that no matter how the council ruled tonight, an unsafe project will still not get approved for the public.

    Council Member Weir then made a motion to have the Planning Commission staff research the practicality, safety and reliability of such a large number of parking lifts before the Planning Commission formally reviews the project (a future step in the process). “Because this has to be a part of their decision making,” Weir said. This motion was made into an official, “Special Condition,” added to the council’s final vote on the issue.

    Before the vote took place, however, some dissension on the tone and actions of the council materialized. Council Member Friedman thought the council was micromanaging in areas where it had no expertise. “I took a 15-year-break. Now I see why (laughs). I’m not sure I have the experience to micromanage the design of the project. I trust staff and the bodies that have seen this before,” he said. He said he would like to approve the project, and would hope that the council would either approve or deny the project as it has been presented.

    Deputy Mayor Rubalcava’s response to Friedman was direct. “Well said, Jim. Nothing further.”

    The council voted to approve  the reviewed project with the special condition added, 6-1. Rubalcava was the only “no” vote.

    Capital Improvement Plan, Second Year Additions

    Saved for the very end of the 5-hour City Council Meeting, for some reason, was Public Hearing Item 11B – the Capital Improvement Plan. Presented very quickly by Interim Public Works Director Mary Joyce, few people in the room really knew what was being discussed or presented. Staff was basically just going through the motions. So much so that, well into the presentation, Deputy Mayor Sofia Rubalcava asked Ms. Joyce, “When are we having the public hearing on this Capital Improvement Plan?” The answer was, “We’re in it right now.”  

    The proposed additional projects to the second year of CIP for years 2018-2024 are as follows:

    • City Hall East Re-Roof
    • Police/Fire Headquarters Additional Parking
    • (Resolutions required for the following additions due to potential conflicts with the City Council)  
    • Pierpont Neighborhood Stormwater Lift Station and Waterline Replacement – Pierpont Lanes
    • Slurry Seal – Ondulando Neighborhood and Waterline Replacement, Ondulando Phase 4
    • Emergency Generators at Various Sites
    • Resolution adopting the remaining 2018-24 CIP Projects, including Arroyo Verde Playground Rebuild; Westpark-Portland Loo Restrooms
    • The Addition of Four Professional Engineering/Project Management Positions, funded by Capital Projects, in the Public Works Department, to Focus on Delivering Capital Improvement Projects

    The council is required by charter to adopt this year’s Capital Improvement Plan no later than April 1, 2019. The votes for the additions to the CIP all passed unanimously, with any conflicting council person abstaining where necessary.

    Museum of Ventura County Funding; FY 2019-20

    Formal item 12B was seeking direction for, and authorization for, funding for up to $250 thousand for the Museum of Ventura County, for FY 2019-20. The presentation was given by Museum Executive Director Elena Brokah.

    Some of the key ongoing program goals for the museum include increasing attendance, bringing in diverse audiences and developing robust partnerships throughout the county. In the last eight months of completed records, some accomplishments of the museum under Brokah’s leadership include increasing audience numbers by 25%, introducing 35 new programs, launching multiple rapid response collecting efforts, and designing/starting construction on interactive amenities in the Children’s Garden.

    As for private funding, during that same eight month period, the museum raised nearly $900 thousand, increased earned revenue by over 50%, and secured 248 new donors. The museum has spent more than $1 million, however, including $900,000 on an endowment, with the rest on capital improvements, projects and operating expenses. The museum still requires a new roof, at a cost of $240 thousand, and another $140,000 for other one-time projects.

    Museum Executive Director Elena Brokah

    Council Member Nasarenko asked what the previous $250 thousand granted to the museum went toward. Ms. Brokah said it did not go toward specific projects. “We had milestones that we had to achieve. It went into projects that were going to bring in new donors.” She also said any new endowment would be used in a similar fashion.

    Nasarenko is fully behind the museum. “I fully support ongoing funding. I think the reconstituted board, your leadership, is vital to our city,” he said.

    Council Member Friedman also supports the museum, and even said that he personally contributes money to it, , but said he is not going to be able to support allocating public money to the museum this year. “It’s not because I’m not supportive of the museum… It has to do with the fact that I ran on essential core services. And the museum, as much as I may love it, is not an essential core service. Essential core services would be public safety, our Police Department, our Fire Fighters. It would be fixing our streets, and our sidewalks and trimming our trees,” he said.

    Friedman added that since he’s been in office, not one person has asked him to send more money to the museum. “It’s embarrassing how our infrastructure has been allowed to crumble,” he commented.

    The council voted to approve of the staff recommendation for the $250 thousand for the museum. The council can still choose to allocate those funds elsewhere if needed at a future date. The vote was 6-1, with Council Member Friedman voting “no.”

    The Mayor’s “State of the City” will be on Monday, March 25, 2019. The next City Council Meeting will be held on the same day, at 6:00 pm. Video archives and agendas for the Ventura City Council Meetings are available at http://cityofventura.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=2.

     

    Kevin Harris

    Kevin Harris is a reporter, editor and journalist, previous President of Cal State Northridge’s Society of Professional Journalists having worked for the LA Times and Newhall Signal. He is now also a Realtor and videographer, and lives with his two children in Thousand Oaks. 


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Overwhelmed ICE Facilities Forced To Release 100,000 Illegal Aliens In Past Three Months

    0

    Jason Hopkins | Energy Investigator

     

    ICE detainment centers have become so overwhelmed with illegal aliens that the agency has been forced to release over 100,000 migrant family members in the past three months.

    While speaking to reporters on Thursday, Nathalie Asher, a senior official with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, revealed that her agency has had to reallocate resources as it deals with a “crushing” surge of illegal aliens on the country’s southern border. ICE has not only been forced to reduce its activity in the interior of the U.S., but the agency’s overcrowded detainment centers have released 107,000 migrant family members in the past three months, averaging more than 1,000 illegals a day.

    “What you’re looking at is our interior arrests have been affected,” Asher said, explaining why ICE arrests have dropped in the past few months. She said her agency is redirecting manpower to their first priority: “addressing what has been occurring and continues to occur at an alarming rate at the border.”

    ICE arrests have dropped 12 percent between Oct. 1 and Dec. 29 of last year, according to the agency’s latest statistics released Thursday. Agents arrested 34,546 during this time period.

    At the same time, an overburdened ICE has released thousands of detainees into the country by the week, requiring only some of them to carry GPS tracking devices or a summons to appear in court.

    The number of border apprehensions have been climbing, with the Department of Homeland Security expecting March to be their highest in over ten years.

    “I want to cut through the politics today to tell you loud and clear: There is no ‘manufactured’ crisis at our southern border. There is a real-life humanitarian and security catastrophe,” Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said Monday during a speech at George Washington University. “The situation at our southern border has gone from a crisis, to a national emergency, to a near system-wide meltdown.”

    Immigration enforcement officials arrested about 75,000 foreign nationals in February, and expect to apprehend nearly 100,000 by the end March, which would be the highest number of apprehensions since 2007. (RELATED: The Amount Of Meth Pouring Across The US Southern Border Is Skyrocketing)

    “The system is breaking, and our communities, our law enforcement personnel, and the migrants themselves are paying the price,” Nielsen continued on Monday.

    The comments from Nielsen and Asher are in stark contrast to a number of Democrats and critics of President Donald Trump who have argued that the border crisis is “manufactured.”

     

    Follow Jason on Twitter.


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Santa Paula: Chair Michael Schouten Presents Youth Advisory Council Journey

    By Sheryl Hamlin

    During Public Presentations of the March 20, 2019 Santa Paula City Council Meeting, Michael Schouten, Chair of the Santa Paula Youth Advisory Council presented the productive journey of the Santa Paula Youth Advisory Council (YAC) as well as goals for future.

    Michael Schouten

    Michael Schouten acknowledged the other committee members: 

    • Vice Chair Nathan Ramos Rodriguez
    • Secretary Daniel Navarro
    • Committee Member Iris Perez
    • Committee Member Pedro Robles

    He also thanked the advisors: Beverly Ruiz and Council Member Crosswhite.

    Starting with peeling paint and stale carpet, the group transformed the space in Las Piedras Park into the Teen Center , which he said “has been transformed. Promoting Youth engagement and serving as a pillar in our community”.

    They the YAC jumped into the world of finance, which included the cost of renovation and staffing the center, so they learned about Measure T from Council Member Sobel who was then a member of the Measure T Commission.

    Since the Teen Center has opened, Michael Schouten noted that 20 to 25 teens come daily to the Teen Center.

    A key point in the report involved mental health issues:

    Aside from the Teen Center we have been focused on catering to the Youth’s needs using are constituents and the Youth Needs Assessment as our compass, in guiding us down this somewhat windy road of policy and community relations. According to the Youth Needs Assessment, mental health access was one of the major needs outlined. Since then Vice Chair Nathan Ramos Rodriquez has worked on creating an ad hoc committee that has been doing an amazing job partnering with various community agencies on bringing awareness to the lack of access to mental health within the community. Recently we heard from Dr. Sandy Gomez, from the Coalition for Family Harmony, who mentioned that they are looking for another community partner in order to provide counseling for our youth.

    He said the Ad Hoc Committee is looking at internships with various organizations across the county and looks forward to meeting with the City of Santa Paula. He also presented a critique of the Needs Assessment Survey.

    To read his entire presentation, click here: Youth Advisory Annual Update by Chair Michael A. Schouten

    History of the Youth Advisory Committee and the Needs Assessment Survey

    September 1, 2015, in Resolution Number 6950, the city council passed a motion to create the Youth Advisory Committee (YAC). Read about this here.

    In June 2017, the Measure T Chair Kristin Majda presented the concept of the Youth Needs Assessment Survey, which was to be done prior to spending the allocations suggested by the Measure T Commission. Read about that meeting here.

    At the June 27, 2017 council meeting, the council votes to spend the Measure T monies for youth services prior to the Needs Assessment Survey. The Chair speaks against this. Read about that meeting here.

    At the April 16, 2018 council meeting, Council Member Crosswhite reported on the Youth Townhall meeting where 110 attended. This was facilitated by the consultant hired for the Needs Assessment Survey. Read the report here.

    At the May 2018 council meeting, Jose Melgar from the Measure T Commission reiterated desire to hold spending until the study was completed. Read his statement here.

    At the December 5, 2018 council meeting, there is a discussion about a change in fee for the consultant performing the Needs Assessment Survey. Read that discussion here.

    The Survey is presented to the council on February 9, 2019. Read the results here.

    Reflection of Council Member Crosswhite

    Council Member Crosswhite said after the meeting that she had been working with the youth group unofficially for a year and now officially as the liaison from council. She said “ it has been a joy to journey with them as they determine what issues are most important to them and as they share their thoughts about how to improve city activities.” She added “Over the past year, the Youth Advisory Council has had great conversations about the Youth Center, mental health services, transportation, education, translation services, equity, internships and so much more.”. She hopes to schedule a joint meeting between the YAC and the Senior Advisory Council.

    Journey

    Starting with the 2015 Resolution to the 2019 Status, the journey has been notably forward with each step making a bigger statement in the community.

    To watch the presentation of Michael Schouten, click here.

     

    For more information on author click sherylhamlin dot com


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Chris Kyle’s Iraqi Interpreter Just Got His Citizenship. He Has Some Things To Say About Trump’s Immigration Policy

    Stephanie Hamill | Video Columnist

    WATCH:


    Former Iraqi Navy SEAL interpreter “Johnny Walker” just got his citizenship, and he has a lot to say about Trump’s immigration policies.

    “If you follow the legal procedure, this country will welcome you and they will love you,” said Walker.

    Walker took part in a naturalization ceremony Wednesday, in which he became a U.S. citizen.

    He told The Daily Caller that it was his dream to live in the United States since he was a teenager.

    Walker spent six years working with SEALs including with late Navy SEAL and sniper Chris Kyle and other special operations forces throughout Iraq, completing over a thousand missions. (RELATED: Remembering American Hero Chris Kyle, Who Died 6 Years Ago Today.) 

    He says he narrowly escaped two attempts on his life.
    _____________________________________________________________________

    The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

    “America Uncensored” is a Daily Caller program dedicated to political stories dominating the news cycle. TheDC’s Stephanie Hamill is a straight shooter who isn’t afraid to tell you what she thinks.

    Hamill has put the Left on blast for turning a blind eye to the violent MS-13 gang, talked about the Left’s war on white men and highlighted the dangers of socialized medicine in some of her recent monologues. Check out a few of Hamill’s other greatest videos and subscribe to our YouTube channel to avoid missing out.

    SUBSCRIBE HERE!

    NOW CHECK OUT The Daily Caller’s Most Popular Shows:

    Would You Rather Date A Trump Supporter or MS-13 Gang Member?

    ‘Trophy Culture’ Hijacks New Jersey High School Cheer Squad

    Fact Checking White House ‘Truth Seekers’ On North Korea

    Follow Stephanie Hamill on Twitter


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    California Is Looking To Tax Drinking Water

    Timothy Snowball | Pacific Legal Foundation

     

    California is known for a lot of things: Ronald Reagan, Hollywood, beaches, hippies, student protests — and some of the most relentlessly progressive politicians in the entire country.

    Simply put, the government of California is out of control. In total, the state added 1,016new laws to the books in 2019, including a silly “straw ban,” intrusive requirements for children’s menus and yet another minimum wage increase. At virtually every level of Californians’ lives, state policymakers are ready to step in and interfere. From the cradle to the grave.

    Now it seems the new governor, Gavin Newsom, is anxious to make his own contribution to the ever-expanding role of government in our lives by taxing some of our most basic necessities in an unprecedented power grab.

    In his ineffable wisdom, the newly elected governor has proposed a statewide tax on, of all things, California’s drinking water. Newsom plans to dedicate the new tax revenues to programs to help communities clean up contaminated water sites. Improving the quality of drinking water may be a worthy goal, but the water tax proposal is a case study in the failures of progressive policymaking.

    First, critics note that the new tax would be difficult and costly to administer. Jon Coupal of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association said the proposed water tax is emblematic “of California’s knee-jerk reaction to default to a new tax whenever there’s a new problem.”

    “It isn’t sound policy to tax a resource that is essential to life,” the Association of California Water Agencies noted, a coalition of public water agencies throughout the state. “The combined local administrative costs would exceed the combined statewide water tax revenue collected with local water bills.”

    But more than concerns over the cost of the new tax or its administrability, is the simple fact that it runs counter to the will of the California electorate.

    In the last election, voters defeated a statewide measure proposed to allocate $500 million in bond funding to ensure compliance with drinking water standards. According to a statewide poll conducted by Tulchin Research in 2018, 73 percent of likely California voters oppose the proposed tax on drinking water.

    “Opposition to this proposed statewide tax on drinking water holds true among every major demographic group in the state,” Tulchin notes. “In a rare display of bipartisanship, Democrats and Republicans oppose the tax by nearly identical margins as do voters in both Northern and Southern California and voters in all ethnic groups.”

    One key to understanding the unpopularity of the water tax is that California is already among the most heavily taxed states in the country. The Foundation for Economic Freedom reports that California already has one of the largest tax burdens in the country, pointing out that “In 2017, the state collected $82 billion in tax revenue — nearly $4 billion more than expected.”

    Yet despite the state’s enviable financial status, Newsom’s plan to improve the quality of drinking water in the state appears to be taken from the usual liberal playbook: More taxes and more government as the solution for every societal problem.

    But this suggests a lack of creative thinking on the part of the governor. There are, in fact, other solutions to the problem of contaminated water, experts say. “We think the problem can be solved without a tax,” says Cindy Tuck, deputy executive director of the ACWA.

    One promising non-tax alternative to improving California’s drinking water is the Safe Drinking Water Trust funded by the state’s general fund during years with a budget surplus, as proposed by ACWA and California Municipal Utilities Association. According to Water Tax Facts, “The net income from the trust would create a durable funding source that will help community water systems in disadvantaged communities provide access to safe drinking water.”

    If the governor is sincere in his desire to address water quality, he should first explore how alternative mechanisms like the Water Trust could be strengthened before he demands more money from already hard-pressed California taxpayers.

    For now, the proposed water tax is further evidence that the state’s liberal politicians are all wet. And if they get their way, the rest of us will simply be hung out to dry.

     

    Timothy Snowball is an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation, a public interest law firm.


    The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE

    Santa Paula: Will the City Downsize and Bifurcate the Municipal Services?

    By Sheryl Hamlin

    This article elaborates on the March 18, 2019 Community meeting where the possibility of a relocation of city services to two different locations was discussed. Read that report here.

    No materials were provided comparing the size and footprint of the current City Hall and municipal services which stretches from Mill to 10th Streets along Ventura to the United Water Conservation District on the corner of 8th and Main Streets.

    This comparison was clearly lacking in the presentation. Marshall Roath, citizen of Santa Paula, has provided a site plan for both locations with dimension. To download this document click here: SP City Hall Alternatives (Roath)

    Highlights

    With street access on three sides, a transit center, a view of the park and easy freeway access, the existing facility sits on about 68,125 square feet of property. The 20,000 square feet of buildings are single stories with room for expansion.

    Located at the corner of 8th and Main Streets, the building has rear access from 8th street and pedestrian access from 8th Street, as currently configured. The property is approximately 30,000 square feet. The building is approximately 8500 sq feet. The building is two stories. Note the siteplan in the document and compare the first floor circulation and conference room size.

    Download the document to read more details on the comparison of the two properties: SP City Hall Alternatives (Roath)

    Bifurcation of Services

    At the same time, the city plans to move the Police, Public Works, Engineering, Community Development, Water Utility Services and the Corporation Yard, Street Maintenance, Fleet Maintenance, Human Resources and Information Technology.to Lemonwood Park, which is south of Hallock Drive. The City has been negotiating with the owners of 270 Quail Court and 1547-1580 Lemonwood Drive near Hallock.

    Shown in the map below, the travel time by car between the Main Street location and the Lemonwood properties epresents early afternoon (3:00 pm) traffic.

    Source: Google Maps

    There was no discussion about travel times. How often do inter-departmental meetings occur? There was an audience question at the March 18, 2019 meeting about the flood issue at Lemonwood which according to the city is minimal.

    Planning

    The city has hired consultants to plan this project, but no details of the planning were presented. Presumably these details will be presented before the city opens escrow on any of these properties.

    Download the comparisons here:SP City Hall Alternatives (Roath)

    For more information on author click sherylhamlin dot com


    Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free  SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE