.
By Stephen Frank, California Political News and Views
“The order came from the top”
Guv Newsom, actually like a frighten dictator is banning a May 1 protest in Sacramento. His actions are similar to those of the Chinese dictator banning protests in Hong Kong. Is there a difference. Both “leaders” are afraid the people will revolt if they talk to one another.
“Following the Monday April 20th protest at the California State Capitol demanding the Governor re-open the state and end the lockdown, the Sacramento Bee reported, “demonstrators defied Gov. Gavin Newsom’s orders banning large gatherings.”
Almost immediately, the California Highway Patrol announced it would no longer issue permits for events at the Capitol.”
Guv Newsom paid $990 million to a firm owned by the Chinese Communist Party—and refuses to let anyone, even Democrats, see the contracts. As a non doctor, he has closed down elective surgeries, needed surgeries and causing the closing, permanently, of rural hospitals. Like the Guv of New Jersey, he does not consider the Constitution as a law, just history. Oh, he has promoted the closing of churches and the harassment of people of Faith who wish to prayer at a church.
Please tell me the difference between Newsom and your historic dictator? Feel free in California?
Related article: Permits Are Denied for May 1st ‘Re-Open California’ Protests at State Capitol
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Citizens Journal.
Stephen Frank: Is the the publisher and editor of the California Political News and Views. Mr. Frank speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows and is a full time political consultant. http://capoliticalnews.com/
Get Citizensjournal.us Headlines free SUBSCRIPTION. Keep us publishing – DONATE
I don’t recall the 1st Amendment saying anything about needing the government’s permission to assemble for redress of grievances. That kind of defeats the whole purpose of the amendment.
And the Chinese, seeing that the optics of the ‘89 Tiananmen Square protest didn’t turn out well, instead, went cloud seeding with a virus and got all those protestors to all but demand that the government there lock them indoors. Let us all be extra diligent as we know the Radical Leftist Dems never put the public good at heart and never see a reason why a public shooting or other false flag should be exempted from the playbook when dealing with we nationalist deplorables.
Thanks for the info and God Bless.